Form DPH-12 · Revised whenever a new model drops

01 / Self-assessment

Let us review the symptoms.

Mark every statement that feels uncomfortably specific. Your answers stay in this browser. The Department has enough paperwork.

In the past seven days...

Live departmental estimate

Prompt Withdrawal Index

0 No symptoms filed

0 of 12

Check the statements above to begin the entirely unofficial review.

Recommended next step

Protect the habit

Keep verifying confident answers, leave private material out, and stop when the useful work is done.

  • Check consequential claims against a primary source.
  • Keep secrets and personal data outside the prompt.
  • Leave the conversation when the question is answered.

DSM-AI · Diagnostic ladder (peer review pending)

02 / Progression

The six stages of “one more prompt.”

Advancement is neither linear nor mandatory. Most people move freely between stages depending on deadlines and available snacks.

  1. Stage 0

    Healthy curiosity

    You ask a useful question. You verify the answer. You leave.

    Clinical note: Astonishing form.

  2. Stage 1

    The polite return

    You come back tomorrow. It remembers nothing. You forgive it.

    Clinical note: Normal tool use with early anthropomorphism.

  3. Stage 3

    Prompt engineer

    Your question now has a role, constraints, examples, and a small constitution.

    Clinical note: The preamble exceeds the task.

  4. Stage 6

    Local MCP collector

    You connected six tools so you would not need to open a seventh tab.

    Clinical note: There are now eleven tabs.

  5. Stage 9

    Context window maximalist

    You no longer provide context. You provide an archive.

    Clinical note: Somewhere, a token counter is crying.

  6. Final stage

    Release notes recreationalist

    You know what changed before your colleagues know there was a release.

    Clinical note: You are reading this website recreationally.

External field report · Exhibit A

“It’s like I have a jet pack. I can’t stop thinking about it.”

Boris Cherny, quoted by Steven Levy in “AI Agents Plunged the Tech World Into Chaos” , WIRED, May 26, 2026.

External field reports · Evidence locker

Exhibits B through I.

Public statements collected from the timeline and entered into evidence. Authenticity: plausible. Outcomes: unverified. Hydration status of the authors: unknown.

  1. Exhibit B

    “I'm giving up drinking because of Claude Code. I need my brain to be maximally pristine so I can sling 10k LOC a day.”

    Garry Tan, public timeline, 5 Mar 2026

    Department note: Filed under recovery programs, competing.

  2. Exhibit C

    “There's a new kind of coding I call ‘vibe coding’, where you fully give in to the vibes, embrace exponentials, and forget that the code even exists.”

    Andrej Karpathy, public timeline, 2 Feb 2025

    Department note: The Bureau confirms the code still exists.

  3. Exhibit D

    “‘Rome wasn't built in a day’ but they didn't have claude code”

    Attribution redacted at 156,000 retweets

    Department note: Rome also lacked a rollback strategy.

  4. Exhibit E

    “huh why tf is claude putting itself as a contributor on my repo!”

    verrsane, public timeline

    Department note: The contributor graph remembers what the operator forgets.

  5. Exhibit F

    “Claude: Hey, mind if I grep -ohP "useEffect\(.*?\[\K[^\]]+" **/*.tsx 2>&1|tr ',' '\n'|awk 'NF{$1=$1;a[$0]++}END{for(k in a)print a[k],k}'|sort -rn|head -20

    Me: ... yeah go for it dude”

    David K, public timeline

    Department note: Consent was obtained. Comprehension was not.

  6. Exhibit G

    “I'm not joking and this isn't funny. We have been trying to have a baby since last year. There are various options, not everyone is aligned... I gave Claude Code a description of the problem, it impregnated my wife in an hour.”

    lucacs, public timeline

    Department note: The Department declines to certify this outcome.

  7. Exhibit H

    “This is what addiction looks like when it's wearing a productivity costume.”

    Mejba Ahmed, “Why I'm Addicted to Claude Code (And Not Embarrassed)”

    Department note: Self-awareness filed. The card was charged regardless.

  8. Exhibit I

    “Addicted to Claude Code — help”

    Thread title, Hacker News

    Department note: The thread recommends breaks and hydration. The Department concurs with the thread.

Exhibits reproduce public statements for satirical commentary under the Department's evidence-handling policy: quote accurately, link when possible, redact when kind, and never mistake a joke for a diagnosis.

International Claudeholics Association · Open protocol

03 / Recovery

A seven-step program with no login streak.

Recovery does not mean abandoning useful tools. It means noticing when the tool has quietly become the activity.

  1. 01 · Biological maintenance

    Drink water.

    The model can wait. Your kidneys have a stricter rate limit.

  2. 02 · Primary sources

    Read the documentation.

    AI can orient you. The source tells you what the source actually says.

  3. 03 · Manual mode

    Write the first draft yourself.

    Struggle is not always inefficiency. Sometimes it is the lesson arriving.

  4. 04 · Peer network

    Ask a human.

    They may disagree, remember context, or suggest lunch. All useful features.

  5. 05 · Context hygiene

    Protect private information.

    Remove secrets, personal data, and anything you would not place on a projector.

  6. 06 · Verification

    Check the confident parts twice.

    Fluency is presentation. Evidence is evidence.

  7. 07 · Carbon-based rendering

    Go outside.

    Observe a tree with no loading state. Maintain one hobby without a roadmap.

Initiate emergency analog protocol

Remain calm. Your context window cannot follow you here.

  1. Save your work.
  2. Close one browser tab.
  3. Put both feet on the floor.
  4. Look at something that was not generated.

No account cancellation is required. This is just a break.

Filed without irony

04 / A balance manifesto

Keep the spark. Keep the skepticism.

Generative AI can be a remarkable companion to curiosity. It can help us cross unfamiliar ground, test an idea, find the shape of a question, or begin when the blank page feels heavier than it should.

But speed is not the same as understanding. A polished answer is not necessarily a true one. When we stop checking, practicing, and making decisions of our own, convenience begins to charge interest.

Craft lives in attention: choosing what matters, noticing what is wrong, and staying with a problem long enough to be changed by it. No tool can outsource that responsibility. Good tools give it more room.

Use AI to expand your agency, not replace it.

Keep learning the fundamentals. Keep private things private. Ask humans what they see. Make something inefficiently, just because your hands and mind deserve the practice. Let an answer surprise you, then verify it.

Curiosity brought us here. Curiosity can also lead us back into the world: to books, collaborators, difficult drafts, patient work, and ideas that are unmistakably our own.

The goal is not less wonder. It is more intention.

Bureau of Context Hygiene · Inspection desk

05 / Context hygiene inspection

Submit a draft prompt for inspection.

A local inspector reviews drafts for secrets, excess context, and missing stopping conditions. Nothing you paste leaves this page; the inspector has no network access and no opinions about you.

Bureau of Context Hygiene · Public notices

06 / Department bulletins

Guidance for a rapidly changing condition.

Occasional field notes for surviving new models, larger context windows, and tools with more permissions than anyone remembers granting.

Three notices filed. More paperwork will be issued only when useful.

Open the bulletin archive

Annual Context Window Census · Live returns

The census is open. Respondents are counted, never identified.

Returns are filed as public GitHub issues containing one stage number and nothing else, then tallied into a static ledger by a scheduled workflow. Consulting the returns fetches one local JSON file; declining to consult them fetches nothing at all.

File a census return

Public records · Some portions tastefully redacted

07 / Department records

For those still reading.

Achievements under review

  • Self-awareness unlocked Reached the bottom of an AI dependency website.
  • Primary source enjoyer Opened the documentation before the chat.
  • Touch grass Left this tab for one uninterrupted minute.

Condition, longitudinally

A daily high-water mark of your Prompt Withdrawal Index, recorded only in this browser. The chart begins when a symptom does.

Footnotes

  1. The Prompt Withdrawal Index has not been peer reviewed, mostly because our peers are busy prompting.
  2. “Claudeholism” is a joke, not a diagnosis. Real distress deserves real support from qualified people.
  3. No models were emotionally attached during development. Several humans remain under observation.

Bureau of Context Hygiene · Personnel division

Sit the inspector examination.

Six exhibits. Two stamps. One certificate with no legal standing whatsoever.

Approved observations · Static public ledger

Patterns, not patient files.

Recognizable AI-use habits paired with useful counterweights. The published ledger contains no personal wellbeing stories.